![]() |
|||||||
|
Volume XV no. 8 July 27, 2001
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
IN THIS ISSUE: Cotton
Corn Insects Sorghum and Peanut Insects Karnal Bunt Concerns for the High Plains
Record high temperatures and dry conditions have stressed the irrigation capabilities of many cotton growers. As a consequence, numerous fields are approaching early cutout with a limited blooming period. Our dryland crop is finally reaching its limits and has entered a terminal downward spiral. Fields with adequate irrigation capabilities have large boll loads and are set for exceptional yields. The main insect concern this week is for the increasing infestations of banded-winged whiteflies present in many but not all fields. This issue of FOCUS provides extensive coverage of this pest. Bollworm activity is increasing with a few more fields reaching treatment levels. Growers should expect more problem fields to develop over the next 7-10 days in spite of all the help we are getting from the abundant predacious insects and spiders. A few fields to the northeast are reportedly having problems with beet armyworms but for the most part we are relatively clean of this pest. Plant bug infestation levels continue to increase and producers are warned not to let this pest slip in and steal your last squares, flowers and bolls. Boll weevils remain at very low levels with activity relatively unchanged from last week. Spider mites, primarily Banks grass mites, are responding to our hot, dry conditions and reaching damaging levels in many corn fields. Most of the current insecticide recommendations are failing to achieve adequate control. Both European and southwestern corn borer moth flights are tapering off but borer larval activity is on the rise in corn. Producers are warned to watch for increased corn earworm activity in both peanuts and sorghum. JFL
Cutout is imminent for many cotton fields. Hot, dry conditions have continued across the west Texas area for yet another week, with spotty rain showers providing very little relief. The forecast for the next several days is for highs to move out of the triple digit area and back down into the high 90's. Nighttime lows remain in the low to middle 70's. These conditions have really pushed cotton along. Where moisture is adequate, cotton is taking advantage of these high temperatures and setting an excellent crop through an extended blooming period. Where moisture is short, plants are often reaching cutout a week to ten days after they begin to bloom. The dryland crop has held up as well as could be expected under these hot, dry conditions but has begun to "crash" in many fields. Because of this early cutout in many fields, there will be opportunities to terminate some fields as early as some time in August. Once cutout occurs (Nodes Above White Flower = 4 or less) another 850-950 heat units is all that is necessary to set the crop up for a harvest aid application. At the current rate of heat unit accumulation (25-29 HU per day) this could occur in 29 to 38 days from cutout. The weevil threat would be over in 12-14 days and the threat from fruit feeding caterpillars would be over in 18-22 days. This would mean that for a field at cutout today, boll weevil worries would be over as early as August 8, worm problems over as early as August 14 and a harvest aid could be applied by August 25th. For some folks, the season is rapidly coming to a close. Concern for banded-winged whitefly infestations is running high. There is no doubt that whitefly numbers are higher in many fields than we have ever seen, especially this early. But there are actually areas in the High Plains production region where cotton fields have yet to see a single whitefly, let alone an infestation. Why we are being blessed with this potential problem this year is anyone's guess. My colleagues in Arizona tell me that whiteflies should not do well under the temperature conditions we have been experiencing. I guess we have "Texas whiteflies", bigger than anyone else's and following no previous rules.Infestations in problem fields have numbers of adults ranging up to over 50 per leaf with nymphal numbers at lower levels of 2-20 per leaf. Infestations are generally not uniformly distributed across the field nor up and down the plant. Usually there are very few whiteflies on the lower third of the plant. These higher numbers are producing visible honeydew but not yet at levels that would be seen with an infestation of cotton aphids at threshold levels of 50 or more aphids per leaf. But, in spite of the yeoman service provided by predacious insects, whitefly numbers are increasing both through reproduction and movement of adults into fields from adjacent alternate hosts. The typical questions we are getting (and my attempt at answers) are as follows: What is the life cycle of whiteflies? The adult whitefly is about 1/16th inch long andlooks like a little white moth. First instar nymphs are smaller than 1/30th of an inch long. Adult whiteflies mate and females lay eggs on leaves generally just below the terminal area. Eggs hatch in about 5 days. The 1st instar nymphs are sometimes known as crawlers because they move short distances until they find a suitable feeding site on a leaf. Then they insert their mouthparts and become immobile, much like a scale insect. These somewhat clear nymphs are often mistaken for eggs and look to some people like little jellyfish. These nymphs feed for about 5 days and then spend the next 5 days in a pseudo-pupal stage. The entire life cycle takes about two weeks. Adults can live up to three weeks and lay almost 150 eggs. See the July 13th issue of FOCUS for pictures of whiteflies. What are the hosts for the banded-wing whitefly? The host range for this species is not as great as the silverleaf whitefly but nonetheless quite extensive. We are noticing large numbers of adults in sunflower but few nymphs at this time. This could be an important source for infestations moving into cotton and for re-infestation if a cotton field is treated. Several weeds in the Solenaceae and Malvaceae plant families could serve as hosts. These weeds would include silverleaf nightshade, ground cherry, black and hairy nightshade; venice mallow, alkali mallow/sida and velvetleaf. How would you sample for whiteflies? I would look at 40 plants per 100 acre field unit and inspect the 5th leaf down from the smallest uppermost leaf in the terminal (counting this upper leaf as one). Carefully turn the leaf over by its tip and count the number of adults present. If you are in a rush, this is all you need to do. It would be helpful to know if there are any nymphs present but counting these would take considerable more time. Time of day does not matter.What kind of damage can I expect from whiteflies? Much like aphids, whiteflies extract sap from plants, pulling out nitrogen, carbohydrates and water. The excess sugars and water are excreted onto the lower leaves as honeydew. Under humid conditions, this honeydew could provide a substrate for the growth of a sooty mold fungus, which could shade the infected leaf and reduce photosynthesis. This is most unlikely for a dry area such as ours. The main problem would come from excessive sap extraction and the subsequent reduction in boll size and weight. This would lead to a yield reduction. Another, more serious problem that could develop would be honeydew deposits on open cotton. We've worried about this with cotton aphids before but whitefly honeydew is much stickier than aphid honeydew because of the trehalulose sugar present. This is one of the "stickiest" sugars. Hopefully this problem will be over before much cotton opens or we get a general rain across the area that will not only wash the honeydew problem away but also the whitefly problem. For more information on sticky cotton you can view the publication, "Sticky Cotton Sources & Solutions". When do I need to treat a field? Thresholds for treatment have not been worked out for this species since it has been rare to even concern one's self with this pest in the past. Thresholds are usually based on levels just prior to when economic losses would occur. Additional lead time may have to be worked into the equation if control is difficult. The economic threshold for silverleaf whiteflies is 5 adults per indicator leaf. Everyone I've talked to would agree that this is too low a number for the banded-winged whitefly. Arizona suggested 10-15 adults per leaf as a treatment level. I still think this is way to low. Banded-winged whiteflies should be easier to control, require lower rates and fewer applications than for the silverleaf whitefly. I have not observed honeydew deposits in any field thus far that would be comparable to that produced by an economically damaging infestation of cotton aphids. The presence of high levels of insect predators and the recent increase in bollworm activity would keep me from being too aggressive.What about help from beneficial insects? There is no doubt in my mind that we are getting a lot of control help out of our abundant beneficial insects. But can they hold the line against an insect that has such a high reproductive rate? In fields with lots of whiteflies we are noticing increased numbers of minute pirate bugs. This is an excellent predator. We have also observed western flower thrips feeding on the immature stages of the whitefly. This thrips species is known to feed voraciously on spider mites. We can now add whiteflies to the list. We have also observed more than one species of wasp in relation to these whitefly infestations. I don't off hand know which parasitic wasps these are. What insecticides provide the best and cheapest control? This is going to be a tough question to answer. First of all, most whitefly insecticide recommendations target the silverleaf whitefly, a species that is admittedly harder to kill. Therefore I would expect that recommended rates could be higher than we need for the banded-winged whitefly. Second, it generally takes two applications of an insecticide to take out the silverleaf whitefly while only one will probably be needed for the banded-winged whitefly. This assumes that there is no further movement of adults into the field.The Lower Rio Grande Valley guide recommends Phaser or Thiodan at 1.33 or 1.66 qts. respectively, for adult silverleaf whitefly control. They also recommend either Capture at 5.2 oz or Danitol at 4.2 oz per acre in combination with acephate (Orthene or Address) at 0.5 lb. active ingredient per acre for a combined adult and immature silverleaf whitefly control. Arkansas suggests Capture at 3.9-6.4 oz per acre, Monitor at 16-32 oz per acre or Danitol at 8-16 oz plus 0.5 lb. active ingredient per acre. Based on discussions with Arizona, I would not expect Provado to be a great material and therefore I would not be real enthusiastic about Leverage either. Thiodan or Phaser would be good adulticides but may not handle the immatures. I'm real curious about Centric and would expect that it would be a good material. The label has one rate, 3.0 oz per acre, and cautions that two applications may be necessary. I would also expect that several pyrethroids in combination with 0.5 lbs. active ingredient of acephate would handle adults and nymphs of the banded-winged whitefly. These pyrethroids might include: Asana, Baythroid, Capture, Danitol, Karate and Orthene. Other pyrethroids might work but I have no data available to me on these at this time. Extension IPM Agents Brant Baugh and Scott Russell initiated a whitefly control trial on Thursday on a field near Idalou scouted by consultant Nathan King. This is a quickie test and includes only Thiodan, Karate Z + Orthene, Centric and an untreated check. A 4-day post count will be made on Monday. July bollworm infestations increasing but spotty. There is increasing activity with this pest across the area. I expect greater activity over the next 5-10 days. This could be a big cycle for the southern High Plains area. I have had reports from the Donley County area of caterpillar infestations as high as 31,000 per acre. Closer to Lubbock, infestations have not reached these lofty levels yet but have in a limited number of cases reached up to 25,000 per acre. The general pattern right now is extremely spotty, sometimes even within an individual field. We have found high numbers in one field and virtually no caterpillars in surrounding fields. Go figure! This means you must scout individual fields to locate those that are in need of assistance. I'm hoping we can hold the line against whiteflies with the help from predacious insects until we need to spray for bollworms. Then, if the aphids are not a problem, you could mix your pyrethroid with Orthene or Address to control both bollworms and whiteflies. You would also "punish" the plant bugs present as well.A few hot spots for beet armyworms have popped up. Numbers of beet armyworms in High Plains cotton fields remain very low for the most part. I did receive a disturbing report of a field off the Caprock northeast of here that averaged 38,000 "beets" per acre. Heat and numerous beneficial insects have helped keep troubles with this pest at a minimum. Trap catches are relatively unchanged from last week in the three active High Plains boll weevil eradication zones. Both the Western (WHP) (32 moths/trap-week) and Permian Basin (PB) (12 moths per trap-week) counts are much lower than last year (172 and 83 respectively) while the Northwest zone (NWP) (199 per trap-week) catches are running higher than last year (122) for this time of year. Still, trap catches are well below the levels we saw in June (over 300 in the NWP zone). Adult boll weevils and punctured squares are hard to find. While first summer generation boll weevils are rocking and rolling out in area cotton fields their numbers are so low it is hard to find a dancing partner. Finding puncture squares is tough too. As more fields reach cutout, weevils will become more apparent in some fields. Hopefully this will not be a problem until late August or early September when the Northern High Plains and Southern High Plains zones start their program. Foundation trap catches are basically unchanged from last week with the three active zones averaging about 4 weevils per 1000 traps checked. The Northern High Plains and Southern High Plains zones have higher trap catches with 81 and 118 weevils, respectively, caught the past week per 1000 traps checked. These are bigger numbers but still incredibly low for our area when looking back over the past 5 years. Treated acreage remains low this week with 9,959, 27,195, and 30,590 acres treated in the NWP, PB and WHP zones respectively.Producers that have failed cotton and have either left the field fallow or planted to another crop are cautioned to make sure there are no viable cotton plants left. If so, the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation will still have to trap the field, spray the field and assess you for the field. Plant bug infestation levels continue to increase. Western tarnished plant bugs continue to increase in some fields, primarily fields near alternate hosts. Continue monitoring fields to prevent unnecessary losses of large squares, flowers and small bolls. Pyrethroids in general are very effective against this pest as are Orthene or Address.Aphid infestations still not a problem. Luckily, aphids remain on hold in most fields with a few notable exceptions. With a potential bollworm problem around the corner, this could change with the expected increase in the use of pyrethroids. So far this pest is providing a nice source of food for many beneficial insects. False chinch bugs have over stayed their welcome in some fields. There remain a few fields that still hold tremendous numbers of this pest, enough to cause breathing problems when scouting close to a infested cotton plant. Most insects are found beneath the bracts of larger squares. There are still no observed or reported adverse effects from these later infestations.Natural enemies are finding a target rich environment. What more can I say? Large numbers of predacious insects and spiders continue to develop in most area fields. Low insecticide use by producers and the Foundation plus an abundant food supply have resulted in a very nice situation for growers. If we can continue to hold on to these insects and spiders then a number of fields will escape the season without the need of our assistance through supplemental insecticidal control. JFL
Spider mite infestations are getting worse. This is not a surprise to anyone. Mites are nearing the ear leaf in some fields. Things are worse north of I-40. Dr. Robert Bowling (Extension IPM Agent for Moore County) has reported severe control problems from Dumas to Dalhart. Growers there are trying everything in hopes of finding something that works. Robert said that the best job so far was a mixture of 2 pints Furadan + 1 pint Dimethoate + 2 pints of cottonseed oil applied with 5 gallons of water per acre. The cottonseed oil is not an insecticide, but it helps get more of the insecticide spray down in the canopy. What happened to Capture? First, recall our advice against spraying for rootworm adults. Even if the mites were not at all resistant, but survived the rootworm adult application through one of several possible means, they would then be free to reproduce unchecked by beneficial insects and predatory mites. If a pyrethroid was used for rootworm adults, then the mites present were likely exposed to the pyrethroid. Spider mites resist pyrethroids through the mechanism known as target site insensitivity, which results from an alteration in the molecule against which the insecticide acts. If some mites in the field had some resistance, then some would have survived the rootworm adult application and continued to multiply, again unchecked by biological control. (Aside: early use of organophosphates would allow mites to crank up the mixed function oxidase (MFO) detoxification systems they use against organophosphates.) It is too soon to talk about tolerance or true resistance to Capture, especially since no one has run the laboratory tests that are required. Secondly, Capture does not work as well in the heat as it does when it is cooler. And, stressed corn helps the mites become more tolerant of insecticides ahead of the actual application. Third, while Banks grass mite is the most numerous species now, twospotted spider mites may also be present in many fields. A Capture application may have cleaned up most of the Banks grass mite problem, but left the twospotted mites relatively intact (suppression only). The hot and dry weather then promoted rapid increases in mites, and we ended up where we are today. This is why it is imperative to identify the mite species before choosing insecticides. Much of this is conjecture and hand waving, we do not really know what is happening. All I can say for sure right now is that Capture does not seem to be working well against Banks grass mites north of I-40, but reports from other areas suggest it is working fine. Suggested insecticides in our new corn guide (unpublished) for Banks grass mite control will include Capture, Furadan + Dimethoate, Dimethoate, Comite II, and sulfur. The suggested arsenal for twospotted spider mites is smaller: Furadan + Dimethoate, Comite II, and sulfur. According to previous work by Dr. Tom Archer and Eddie Bynum at the Lubbock Research and Extension Center, there may be some other options if things get really bad. A true synergistic mixture would be dimethoate + Capture + PBO (piperonyl butoxide). Growers could also try dimethoate + Capture + Furadan. It is essential to use at least 5 gallons of water per acre in aerial application, and more is better. Good coverage is a must. We have not come to this point yet in Extension District 2, and hopefully we will not do so. Tolerance and resistance start out as local problems, and we do not spray adult rootworms as readily as is done north of I-40. Just because Capture and other insecticides are having problems north of I-40 does not necessarily mean we will have the same problems here. I would appreciate reports of control failures in our area counties. Southwestern and European corn borer flights are tapering off. "Europeans" are at the tail end of their flight and "southwesterns" are somewhere near 65% done. If a treatment is justified, think about adding a miticide to the spray tank. PP I lumped these two crops together because the corn earworm (one of the insects in the sorghum headworm complex) flight is beginning. Greg Cronholm and I trapped moths Wednesday night and found several very young and healthy earworm adults. Populations will pick up from here, so scout for eggs and small larvae. The hot and dry wind will help kill eggs, so it might pay to base treatments on small larvae. At a minimum, don't assume all the eggs will hatch. Dry, shriveled eggs are dead and round eggs are most likely still viable. I am not going to go into thresholds in this issue, in part because water is more important right now. PP
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of wheat that has been common to India, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Turkey. In 1996 it was found in a sample of durum wheat seed in Arizona. At the time of the discovery it had been distributed widely in Arizona and New Mexico and limited areas of California and Texas. This seed had been planted in El Paso and Hudspeth counties of Texas. A national survey in 1997 found it present in hard red winter wheat in San Saba County. This year many positive samples were found in San Saba County, due to environmental conditions that favored the fungus. Positive samples were also found in Throckmorton, Young, Archer and Baylor counties. Two wheat samples were sent to my office recently. They came from loads that were rejected at the elevator because of their offensive "fishy" odor. These samples contained common bunt (stinking bunt), which has a similar "fishy" odor. Distinguishing between the two bunts with a whole grain sample was relatively easy as common bunt typically decays the entire kernel, filling it with black spores. Karnal bunt, also called partial bunt, typically decays only part of the kernel. In addition, common bunt spores are easy to see through with a microscope, but karnal bunt spores are solid black. The bunted grain in both samples filled the whole kernel and they were not black under the microscope. Both were common bunt. High Plains wheat growers should be concerned about bringing this fungus to their farm. It enters on infested wheat seed, plant parts (hay), livestock, manure and infested soil on equipment. Karnal bunt does not reduce yields as much as other smuts and bunts that are common in Texas. But the concern is not yield reduction. The concern is market reduction. Most wheat producing and buying countries have severe restrictions to prevent movement of karnal bunt into their country. If you bring this fungus into your county, all wheat growers in the county will have great difficulty marketing their grain and will have to deal with a lot of government regulation. This is one disease you do not want! The immediate concern is disease free planting seed for those who plant in August for grazing. Yes you need to be concerned even if you are not going for grain. If you bring it in, it will spread and be detected very quickly. Do not buy "bin-run" seed even to fill corners or to kill for reduced tillage operations. Buy quality seed of known origin. Avoid any seed grown in the karnal bunt counties mentioned earlier. Every wheat seed that goes in the ground should be treated. Fungicides that control bunts include PCNB and carboxin. Some of the products that include these two fungicides are Terraclor Super X (planter box), Apron-Terraclor Dust (planter box), Vitavax 200, RTU Vitavax-Thiram (planter box), Enhance and Enhance Plus. If you have a lot of seed that you are concerned about, "fishy" smelling or not, I would be glad to take a look at it. Call Harold Kaufman at (806) 746-4053. HK
August 21-22: Sharing the Success, Lubbock Research and Extension Center. Contact Dr. Wenwei Xu at (806) 746-6101. August 23: 2001 Food-Grade Corn Field Day, Lubbock Research and Extension Center. Dr. Xu is the contact for this one too. Agenda items include a walk-through of the food grade corn plots, corn earworm resistance damage ratings, drought tolerance evaluations and breeding, and many other items. Don't hesitate to call for an agenda. PP
|
|||||||