Table 1

Table 1.  Harvest results from the irrigated replicated cotton variety demonstration, Mark Moore Farms, Crosby County, TX 2001.
Variety Lint
turnout		 Seed
turnout		 Bur cotton
yield		 Lint
yield		 Seed
yield		 Lint loan
value		 Lint
value		 Seed
value		 Total
value		 Ginning
cost		 Systems
cost		 Net
value
% % lb/acre lb/acre lb/acre $/lb $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre
DP 458B/RR 31.1 54.2 1978 616 1073 0.5543 341.51 45.61 387.12 29.68 52.25 305.19 a
ST 4793R 31.4 50.1 1835 576 919 0.5423 312.32 39.06 351.38 27.52 27.09 296.77 a
ST 4892BR 29.9 49.0 2020 604 991 0.5478 331.04 42.13 373.17 30.30 49.83 293.03 a
PM 2379RR 29.5 53.9 1865 551 1007 0.5210 288.01 42.79 330.81 27.98 17.99 284.84 ab
ST 2454R 31.0 52.7 1729 536 913 0.5397 289.23 38.80 328.03 25.94 18.96 283.13 ab
PM 2266RR 28.4 53.2 1846 523 983 0.5367 280.58 41.78 322.36 27.69 17.84 276.83 abc
AP 1500RR 33.9 53.4 1561 529 834 0.5440 288.24 35.45 323.69 23.42 26.33 273.94 abcd
PM 2280BG/RR 28.4 54.2 1751 497 949 0.5423 269.54 40.31 309.85 26.27 37.94 245.64 bcd
PM 2326BG/RR 29.5 54.8 1867 549 1023 0.4767 262.16 43.47 305.63 28.00 39.08 238.55 cd
PM 2156RR 28.9 54.8 1747 505 960 0.4687 236.85 40.80 277.65 26.20 17.84 233.61 d
CV, % 6.9 2.0 4.4 7.2 5.0 2.4 8.2 5.0 7.5 4.4 — 8.8
LSD 0.05 3.6 1.8 138 7 83 0.0214 40.70 3.53 42.76 2.07 — 41.68
For net value/acre, means within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.
CV – coefficient of variation, LSD – least significant difference.
OSL – observed significance level, or probability of a great F value.
Note: some columns may not add up due to rounding error.
Assumes:
$1.50/cwt ginning cost (bagging, ties and checkoff not included).
$85/ton for seed.
Value for lint based on CCC loan value from grab samples and ITC HVI results.

Comments are closed.