Table 1

Table 1.  Harvest results from the irrigated replicated cotton variety demonstration, Jim Parkhill Farms, Crosby County, TX 2001.
Variety Lint
turnout
Seed
turnout
Bur cotton
yield
Lint
yield
Seed
yield
Lint loan
value
Lint
value
Seed
value
Total
value
Ginning
cost
Systems
cost
Net
value
% % lb/acre lb/acre lb/acre $/lb $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre
AP 6101 31.5 53.4 3883 1221 2072 0.5570 680.26 88.05 768.31 58.25 12.00 698.06 a
DG 256 31.7 54.9 3343 1057 1838 0.5515 582.97 78.11 661.08 50.15 9.60 601.33 ab
DP 2156 34.6 52.4 3221 1111 1687 0.5140 570.93 71.67 642.60 48.31 10.13 584.17 ab
AFD Raider 271 30.7 59.3 3216 997 1928 0.5440 543.41 81.95 625.36 48.25 13.65 563.46 b
Excess Plus 27.9 54.9 3499 977 1923 0.5547 541.61 81.75 623.36 52.48 8.85 562.03 b
PM HS26 30.6 55.3 3499 1069 1939 0.5030 540.96 82.43 623.39 52.49 10.13 560.77 b
FM 5015 31.0 54.6 3060 951 1674 0.4990 474.16 71.14 545.30 45.90 9.90 489.50 b
FM 5013 29.6 53.4 3195 944 1702 0.4952 469.18 72.33 541.51 47.93 9.90 483.69 b
Sphinx 29.9 49.2 3170 949 1559 0.4957 470.43 66.29 536.71 47.55 6.15 483.02 b
Atlas Plus 29.0 53.8 2967 860 1591 0.5410 465.40 67.64 533.04 44.51 8.85 479.68 b
CV, % 4.6 5.3 9.7 10.3 12.9 4.8 13.3 12.9 13.1 9.7 13.8
LSD 0.05 2.4 4.9 NS 180 379 0.0430 121.56 NS 137.42 NS 130.27
For net value/acre, means within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.
CV – coefficient of variation, LSD – least significant difference.
Note: some columns may not add up due to rounding error.
Assumes:
$1.50/cwt ginning cost (bagging, ties and checkoff not included).
$85/ton for seed.
Value for lint based on CCC loan value from grab samples and ITC HVI results.

Comments are closed.