Table 45. Results of the irrigated regional seed treatment test at the Dale Swinburn Farm, Tulia, Texas, 1999. | ||||||||||||
Agronomic Properties | % Open | |||||||||||
% Final | % Turnout | % Lint | Boll | Seed | Lint | Seed Per | Bolls | |||||
Treatment | Yield | Stand | Lint | Seed | Picked | Pulled | Size | Index | Index | Boll | 10-7-99 | |
19 | 907 | 62.0 | 28.8 | 47.7 | 36.3 | 28.1 | 5.4 | 11.1 | 6.5 | 30.6 | 61 | |
5 | 883 | 53.5 | 28.5 | 47.0 | 36.0 | 27.3 | 5.4 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 32.8 | 58 | |
8 | 883 | 39.5 | 28.4 | 45.7 | 35.2 | 27.4 | 5.4 | 10.1 | 5.9 | 31.8 | 59 | |
16 | 860 | 48.6 | 28.1 | 48.4 | 36.8 | 27.5 | 5.3 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 32.6 | 66 | |
26 | 860 | 52.6 | 28.9 | 46.1 | 37.0 | 28.1 | 5.7 | 10.4 | 6.4 | 33.4 | 59 | |
23 | 836 | 53.5 | 27.4 | 46.0 | 35.2 | 27.0 | 5.8 | 10.9 | 6.3 | 34.1 | 66 | |
11 | 824 | 48.1 | 27.7 | 46.6 | 36.2 | 27.8 | 5.8 | 10.1 | 5.9 | 35.5 | 74 | |
12 | 824 | 64.5 | 27.0 | 45.9 | 38.2 | 29.1 | 5.4 | 10.2 | 6.4 | 32.0 | 66 | |
31 | 824 | 56.5 | 27.3 | 45.3 | 35.8 | 27.7 | 6.1 | 10.6 | 6.6 | 33.1 | 53 | |
9 | 813 | 52.8 | 26.4 | 44.2 | 36.8 | 28.5 | 5.3 | 9.8 | 5.9 | 33.3 | 68 | |
4 | 812 | 55.4 | 27.7 | 44.7 | 36.8 | 28.2 | 5.6 | 10.7 | 6.5 | 32.2 | 66 | |
30 | 812 | 50.5 | 27.1 | 44.9 | 37.7 | 28.8 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 6.2 | 32.3 | 65 | |
15 | 801 | 49.9 | 26.4 | 43.3 | 37.5 | 28.0 | 5.5 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 32.6 | 68 | |
20 | 801 | 59.2 | 28.7 | 46.6 | 40.5 | 29.4 | 5.0 | 10.3 | 6.6 | 31.1 | 71 | |
32 | 801 | 59.6 | 27.9 | 44.8 | 36.0 | 27.2 | 5.3 | 10.8 | 6.4 | 30.2 | 61 | |
21 | 777 | 46.1 | 26.2 | 43.4 | 35.6 | 27.1 | 5.4 | 11.0 | 6.4 | 29.9 | 68 | |
3 | 765 | 51.1 | 27.4 | 45.0 | 36.4 | 27.9 | 5.5 | 10.4 | 6.2 | 32.1 | 69 | |
10 | 765 | 54.1 | 25.5 | 42.7 | 36.1 | 27.4 | 5.4 | 10.0 | 5.9 | 33.0 | 54 | |
25 | 765 | 34.3 | 28.0 | 46.3 | 35.3 | 27.2 | 5.2 | 9.5 | 5.5 | 33.5 | 61 | |
22 | 754 | 40.1 | 24.7 | 40.9 | 34.4 | 26.1 | 5.6 | 10.5 | 5.9 | 32.6 | 61 | |
17 | 753 | 49.2 | 27.8 | 45.6 | 36.6 | 27.1 | 5.4 | 10.3 | 6.2 | 32.2 | 65 | |
7 | 742 | 47.2 | 27.6 | 46.4 | 34.8 | 26.3 | 5.8 | 10.3 | 5.8 | 34.3 | 57 | |
29 | 718 | 38.5 | 26.2 | 43.0 | 37.3 | 28.2 | 5.6 | 10.2 | 6.3 | 33.3 | 53 | |
28 | 706 | 35.8 | 26.3 | 44.2 | 35.1 | 26.9 | 5.6 | 10.4 | 6.0 | 32.8 | 64 | |
6 | 695 | 44.9 | 25.4 | 44.6 | 38.9 | 28.1 | 5.1 | 9.4 | 6.1 | 32.5 | 59 | |
% Open | ||||||||||||
% Final | % Turnout | % Lint | Boll | Seed | Lint | Seed Per | Bolls | |||||
Treatment | Yield | Stand | Lint | Seed | Picked | Pulled | Size | Index | Index | Boll | 10-7-99 | |
14 | 695 | 53.1 | 25.8 | 44.6 | 37.3 | 28.8 | 5.4 | 10.2 | 6.2 | 32.7 | 57 | |
18 | 695 | 47.7 | 25.2 | 42.1 | 37.1 | 29.6 | 5.6 | 10.3 | 6.3 | 33.2 | 61 | |
13 | 671 | 41.5 | 27.2 | 46.6 | 37.5 | 27.5 | 5.0 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 30.7 | 67 | |
27 | 671 | 38.0 | 28.0 | 46.5 | 34.9 | 27.0 | 5.9 | 10.2 | 5.8 | 35.2 | 61 | |
Untreated | 659 | 40.1 | 26.3 | 43.4 | 37.3 | 28.1 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 6.1 | 33.5 | 55 | |
24 | 659 | 44.3 | 26.4 | 43.8 | 35.9 | 27.2 | 5.8 | 10.4 | 6.0 | 34.2 | 48 | |
2 | 612 | 44.3 | 24.4 | 42.1 | 36.5 | 27.6 | 5.5 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 32.8 | 70 | |
Mean | 770 | 48.6 | 27.1 | 45.1 | 36.5 | 27.7 | 5.5 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 32.8 | 62 | |
C.V. % | 18.7 | 23.2 | 7.2 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 24.3 | |
LSD 0.05 | 169 | 21.4 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 18 |
The cultivar used was Paymaster 2200RR.
Table 45A. Results of the irrigated regional seed treatment test at the Dale Swinburn farm, Tulia, Texas, 1999. | ||||||||||
Micro- | Uni- | Elon- | Leaf | Color | ||||||
Treatment | naire | Length | formity | Strength | gation | Index | Rd | +b | Grade1/ | |
19 | 4.9 | 0.99 | 81.2 | 26.6 | 5.8 | 1 | 79.8 | 9.2 | 11-2,21-3 | |
5 | 4.8 | 1.01 | 81.4 | 27.4 | 5.4 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.3 | 11-2 | |
8 | 4.7 | 0.98 | 81.4 | 27.6 | 5.9 | 1 | 81.4 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
16 | 4.7 | 1.00 | 80.5 | 26.8 | 5.6 | 1 | 81.2 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
26 | 4.7 | 1.02 | 80.9 | 26.9 | 5.7 | 1 | 80.9 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
23 | 4.6 | 1.00 | 81.5 | 27.0 | 5.4 | 1 | 81.3 | 9.0 | 11-2 | |
11 | 4.8 | 1.00 | 80.1 | 28.5 | 5.9 | 1 | 81.1 | 9.2 | 11-2 | |
12 | 4.8 | 1.01 | 81.2 | 27.8 | 5.9 | 1 | 80.9 | 9.2 | 11-2 | |
31 | 5.0 | 1.02 | 82.5 | 27.7 | 5.6 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.3 | 11-2 | |
9 | 4.9 | 1.01 | 80.7 | 27.0 | 5.2 | 1 | 81.2 | 9.2 | 11-1,11-2 | |
4 | 4.6 | 1.02 | 81.9 | 27.8 | 5.8 | 1 | 81.0 | 9.1 | 11-1,11-2 | |
30 | 4.8 | 1.00 | 81.4 | 26.4 | 5.3 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.3 | 11-2 | |
15 | 4.9 | 0.98 | 81.2 | 26.3 | 5.3 | 1 | 80.8 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
20 | 4.7 | 0.99 | 81.3 | 26.5 | 5.7 | 1 | 80.6 | 9.4 | 11-2,11-3 | |
32 | 4.6 | 1.01 | 80.8 | 26.8 | 5.7 | 1 | 81.0 | 9.4 | 11-1,31-4 | |
21 | 4.6 | 1.02 | 81.8 | 28.0 | 6.1 | 1 | 81.5 | 9.1 | 11-2,11-1 | |
3 | 4.8 | 0.98 | 81.5 | 25.9 | 5.5 | 1 | 80.3 | 9.3 | 11-2,11-4 | |
10 | 4.7 | 1.00 | 81.5 | 27.0 | 5.5 | 1 | 81.0 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
25 | 4.5 | 1.01 | 80.9 | 26.9 | 5.7 | 1 | 81.7 | 9.0 | 11-2 | |
22 | 4.7 | 1.02 | 81.1 | 26.8 | 5.6 | 1 | 80.4 | 9.2 | 11-2,21-1 | |
17 | 4.8 | 0.99 | 81.3 | 26.7 | 5.5 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.2 | 11-2 | |
7 | 4.7 | 1.02 | 81.1 | 27.5 | 5.2 | 1 | 80.8 | 9.2 | 11-2 | |
29 | 4.6 | 1.03 | 81.6 | 27.6 | 5.3 | 1 | 81.4 | 9.1 | 11-2 | |
28 | 4.7 | 1.02 | 81.5 | 27.0 | 5.9 | 1 | 81.2 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
6 | 4.5 | 1.00 | 80.6 | 26.2 | 5.8 | 1 | 80.8 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
Micro- | Uni- | Elon- | Leaf | Color | ||||||
Treatment | naire | Length | formity | Strength | gation | Index | Rd | +b | Grade1/ | |
14 | 4.8 | 1.01 | 81.2 | 26.6 | 5.3 | 1 | 80.8 | 9.3 | 11-2 | |
18 | 4.9 | 0.99 | 81.8 | 26.3 | 5.7 | 1 | 80.8 | 9.3 | 11-2 | |
13 | 4.9 | 0.97 | 80.8 | 27.4 | 5.4 | 1 | 81.2 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
27 | 4.9 | 0.99 | 80.3 | 27.1 | 5.3 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.0 | 11-2 | |
Untreated | 4.7 | 1.01 | 81.1 | 26.2 | 5.3 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.1 | 11-2 | |
24 | 4.6 | 1.01 | 81.4 | 26.9 | 5.6 | 1 | 80.7 | 9.3 | 11-1,11-2 | |
2 | 4.8 | 1.02 | 81.1 | 27.1 | 5.5 | 1 | 80.9 | 9.2 | 11-2 | |
Mean | 4.7 | 1.00 | 81.2 | 27.0 | 5.5 | 1 | 80.9 | 9.2 | ||
C.V. % | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 0 | 0.6 | 1.7 | ||
LSD 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | ||
1/ Fiber quality determinations were made on samples from two reps. If the color grade from these two samples were identical, only one color grade is reported. If they were different, both are reported.