Treatment |
Bur cotton |
Lint |
Seed |
Lint to seed |
Lint |
Seed |
Lint |
Lint |
Seed |
Total |
Fertilizer |
Gin |
Net |
|
yield |
turnout |
turnout |
|
yield |
yield |
loan value |
value |
value |
value |
cost |
cost |
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lb/acre |
percent |
percent |
ratio |
lb/acre |
lb/acre |
$/lb |
$/acre |
$/acre |
$/acre |
$/acre |
$/acre |
$/acre |
|
|
|
|
70-0-0 |
2820 |
29.3 |
52.4 |
0.56 |
824 |
1478 |
0.4813 |
393.91 |
62.81 |
456.72 |
19.31 |
43.71 |
393.70 |
a |
70-30-0 |
2870 |
29.1 |
51.0 |
0.57 |
832 |
1465 |
0.4725 |
393.41 |
62.25 |
455.66 |
26.70 |
44.48 |
384.48 |
ab |
35-30-0 |
2550 |
29.5 |
52.2 |
0.57 |
752 |
1329 |
0.4838 |
363.96 |
56.47 |
420.44 |
15.09 |
39.52 |
365.83 |
ab |
35-0-0 |
2334 |
29.5 |
53.3 |
0.55 |
688 |
1242 |
0.4832 |
331.33 |
52.79 |
384.12 |
11.69 |
36.18 |
336.25 |
bc |
check |
2091 |
29.6 |
51.7 |
0.57 |
620 |
1080 |
0.4785 |
296.53 |
45.91 |
342.43 |
0.00 |
32.42 |
310.02 |
c |
|
|
|
|
CV, % |
9.0 |
2.4 |
1.8 |
2.8 |
9.7 |
8.2 |
6.5 |
9.2 |
8.3 |
8.8 |
—– |
9.0 |
9.4 |
OSL |
0.0142 |
0.8781 |
0.1320 |
0.4980 |
0.0290 |
0.0102 |
0.9904 |
0.0263 |
0.0103 |
0.0200 |
—– |
0.0142 |
0.0766 |
LSD 0.10 |
347 |
NS |
NS |
NS |
109 |
165 |
NS |
49.58 |
7.02 |
54.95 |
—– |
5.37 |
51.12 |
For net value/acre, means within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. |
|
CV – coefficient of variation |
|
OSL – observed significance level. |
|
LSD – least significant difference at 10% level, NS – not significant. |
|
|
Note: some columns may not add up due to rounding error |
|
|
|
|
|
Assumes: |
|
|
|
|
|
$1.55/cwt ginning cost (bagging, ties and checkoff not included). |
|
|
|
|
|
$85/ton for seed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Value for lint based on CCC loan value for HVI analysis of grab samples submitted to the Texas Tech University International Textile Center. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|