More than 0.5 million ha of irrigated cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) are grown in the Southern High Plains of Texas. Conservation tillage cotton in terminated wheat has been shown to improve water use-efficiency and reduce wind erosion. However, limited N fertilizer response research has been done in this system. The objective of this 3-yr field study at Lubbock, TX was to characterize the response to N fertilizer (0, 28, 56, 84, or 112 kg N ha -1 ) at varying irrigation levels (0, 25, 50, or 75 % ET replacement) for conventional and conservation tillage cotton in an Acuff loam (Aridic Paleustoll). Additionally, we tested the chlorophyll meter as an indicator of in-season N status of cotton and compared it to petiole NO 3 – -N analysis. Cotton lint yields showed a quadratic response to irrigation level in 1996 and 1997, and a linear response in the drought year of 1998. Maximum lint yield varied from 71 to 97 % ET replacement. In 1997 and 1998, cotton lint yields responded to N at the 50 and 75% estimated evapotranspiration (ET) replacement irrigation levels, but not at the 0 or 25% ET levels. Quadratic-plateau models indicated that 19 to 38 kg N additional fertilizer ha -1 was needed to produce economically optimum lint yields near 1100 kg N ha -1 with conservation tillage than with conventional tillage. Chlorophyll meter and petiole NO 3 – -N readings were positively related to N rate but were not affected by tillage system.
Bronson, K.F., A,B, Onken, J.W. Keeling, J.D. Booker, and H.A. Torbert. 2001.
Nitrogen response in cotton as affected by tillage system and irrigation level. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65: 1153-1163.
- Texas A&M Forest Service offers $17,500 in grant funds for Texas High Plains vegetative fuel breaks
- Make Halloween safer by watching for traffic ‘goblins’
- Farm Bill sessions scheduled for West Texas
- Building Strong Families conference set Oct. 24 in Lubbock
- New Texas A&M dual-purpose cotton variety can be used for food, fiber