Seed Treatment Tests – Performance Data – Lubbock – National Test

Table 42. Results of the irrigated national seed treatment test at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Lubbock, Texas, 1999.
Agronomic Properties % Open
% Turnout % Lint Boll Seed Lint Seed Per Bolls Storm
Treatment Yield Lint Seed Picked Pulled Size Index Index Boll 9-12-99 Resistance
11 598 24.7 42.8 35.8 26.7 4.8 10.2 6.2 27.9 32 2.8
12 571 25.4 44.6 35.0 26.1 4.9 10.8 6.3 27.3 47 2.8
13 571 25.1 43.1 35.7 26.2 5.0 10.6 6.3 28.5 55 2.8
7 538 24.6 43.8 36.3 26.6 4.8 10.2 6.2 27.8 44 2.8
1 520 24.8 43.1 36.1 26.3 5.1 10.6 6.4 28.9 54 2.8
3 520 24.5 43.9 36.1 26.7 4.7 10.2 6.1 27.8 46 2.8
16 511 25.8 44.4 34.8 26.6 4.7 10.5 6.0 27.1 42 2.8
20 506 25.1 43.7 33.6 24.9 4.7 10.8 6.1 25.6 49 2.8
2 502 24.9 44.6 36.2 26.7 4.6 10.0 6.0 27.6 41 2.8
10 502 25.3 43.8 35.9 26.5 5.1 10.8 6.5 28.2 58 2.8
18 492 26.0 44.5 33.5 25.1 5.5 11.1 6.2 29.7 51 2.8
15 470 24.3 42.7 35.5 26.1 5.2 10.2 6.0 30.6 52 2.8
6 465 24.6 43.3 35.5 26.0 4.8 10.7 6.4 26.7 46 2.8
5 451 24.8 43.1 35.8 26.1 4.6 10.0 5.9 27.8 40 2.8
14 451 24.1 43.3 35.2 25.6 4.9 10.4 6.1 28.2 52 2.8
4 447 25.0 44.1 36.1 27.1 4.9 9.9 5.9 29.9 46 2.8
17 428 24.5 43.5 34.2 25.3 4.8 10.8 6.1 27.2 54 2.8
Untreated 414 24.5 42.6 33.4 24.9 5.3 10.6 5.9 30.0 40 2.8
9 405 25.2 43.3 36.0 26.8 4.7 10.0 6.1 27.7 64 2.8
8 396 25.0 43.9 35.5 26.0 4.7 10.2 6.2 27.0 41 2.8
Mean 488 24.9 43.6 35.4 26.2 4.9 10.4 6.1 27.9 50 2.8
C.V. % 16.6 4.4 4.0 2.1 2.9 5.8 4.9 5.0 7.3 24.4
LSD 0.05 96 1.3 2.1 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 2.5 14

 

The cultivar used was Paymaster HS26.

Table 42A. Results of the irrigated national seed treatment test at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Lubbock, Texas, 1999.
Micro- Uni- Elon- Leaf Color
Treatment naire Length formity Strength gation Index Rd +b Grade1/
11 5.0 1.05 82.6 30.0 6.6 1 76.8 8.4 31-1,31-2
12 5.1 1.03 82.2 29.0 5.8 1 76.4 8.7 31-1,31-4
13 5.0 1.03 82.9 29.2 6.0 1 76.3 8.4 31-1,41-1
7 4.9 1.03 82.3 29.3 5.9 1 76.7 8.5 31-1,31-4
1 5.0 1.03 82.4 28.8 6.2 1 76.4 8.7 31-1,31-3
3 5.0 1.04 82.6 30.0 6.2 1 76.3 8.6 31-1,31-4
16 4.9 1.04 82.7 29.9 6.4 1 76.5 8.6 31-1,31-4
20 5.1 1.02 82.3 29.3 6.1 1 77.1 8.7 31-1
2 5.0 1.04 83.0 29.7 5.9 1 76.6 8.6 31-2,31-3
10 5.0 1.03 82.1 28.6 5.5 1 76.6 8.7 31-1,31-4
18 4.9 1.04 81.6 30.3 5.7 1 76.5 8.7 31-1,31-3
15 5.0 1.04 82.7 30.2 6.5 1 76.5 8.5 31-1,31-2
6 4.9 1.04 82.4 28.6 6.6 1 77.2 8.6 31-1
5 5.0 1.01 82.6 28.7 6.0 1 76.9 8.5 31-1
14 4.9 1.04 82.7 29.6 6.0 1 76.7 8.7 31-3
4 4.8 1.03 82.4 29.6 5.7 1 76.1 8.4 31-2
17 4.8 1.04 82.3 29.3 6.1 1 76.2 8.7 31-3,31-4
Untreated 5.1 1.04 82.0 29.2 6.0 1 76.9 8.6 31-1
9 4.8 1.00 82.3 28.4 5.4 1 75.9 8.7 31-4
8 5.0 1.03 82.3 29.8 5.9 1 77.3 8.5 31-1,31-2
Mean 4.9 1.03 82.4 29.3 6.0 1 76.6 8.6
C.V.% 2.6 1.2 0.7 2.2 8.3 0 0.9 1.1
LSD 0.05 0.2 0.02 0.9 1.1 0.9 0 1.2 0.2

1/ Fiber quality determinations were made on samples from two reps. If the color grade from these two samples were identical, only one color grade is reported. If they were different, both are reported.

Comments are closed.